Simovart, Mari Ann

Job

Personal data

Education

Career

Lecturer of Civil Law, Institute of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Tartu, 2008–current
Assistant Extraordinary of Civil Law, Institute of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Tartu, 2006–2007
Attorney-at-law, Law Office Lepik & Luhaäär LAWIN, 1995-current

Main areas of research

Professional activity and membership

Academic member, PLAN (procurement law academic network,
http://www.planpublicprocurement.org/main/), 2009

Publications

Doctor's Degree, (sup) C. Ginter, I. Kull. Lepinguvabaduse piirid riigihankes: Euroopa Liidu hankeõiguse mõju Eesti eraõigusele (Limits to Freedom of Contract: the Influence of EC Public Procurement Law on Estonian Private Law), University of Tartu, Faculty of Law. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2010.
Gender Equality as a Possible Secondary Policy in Procurement under Estonian Law. Kull, Irene (Eds.). Development of Estonian Contract and Company Law in the Context of the Harmonized EU law II. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2010, pp. 74-96.
K. Saare, K. Sein, M. A. Simovart. Protection of Consumer Rights in SMS Loan Agreements. European Review of Private Law, 18 (2010), pp. 129-142.
The New Remedies Directive: Would a Diligent Businessman Enter into Ineffective Procurement Contract? The Fourth Public Procurement PhD Conference, The Public
Procurement Research Group, University of Nottigham, UK, 7-8 September 2009.
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pprg/conferencesandevents/pastevents/phd-conference.aspx:, 2009, x-x.
The Standard of Reasonableness in the Estonian Law of Obligations. Kull, I. (Eds.). Developments of Estonian Contract and Company Law in the Context of the Harmonized EU Law. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2007, pp. 65-86.

Articles in Juridica

Limitations on Public Contracts arising from General Principles of Public Procurement. Examples from Dispute Commission Cases, Juridica Abstract, 2012, No. 2, pp. 83-89
Critical Comments on Application of Principle of Reasonableness Decision No. 3-2-1-66-11 of Civil Chamber of Supreme Court, Juridica Abstract, 2012, No. 1, pp. 67-72
The Invalidity of a Public Contract due to Violation of the Fundamental Principles of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Juridica Abstract, 2011, No. 2, pp. 91-99
Freedom to Amend a Public Procurement Contract in the Light of General Principles of Public Procurement, Juridica Abstract, 2010, No. 4, pp. 248-257
Protection of Consumer Rights in SMS Loan Agreements, Juridica Abstract, 2010, No. 1, pp. 41-50
Realization of Secondary Objectives through Public Procurement Procedure in Estonia. The Example of Gender Equality, Juridica Abstract, 2009, No. 3, pp. 148-158
The Right to Demand Amendment of a Public Contract Where the Balance of Obligations of the Parties Has Changed, Juridica Abstract, 2008, No. 4, pp. 219-229
The Invalidity of Unfair Standard Terms in Public Contracts as an Example of Unfair Contract Terms Regulation, Juridica Abstract, 2008, No. 1, pp. 29-38
Distinguishing Mistake and Fraud as Grounds for Cancellation of a Transaction, Juridica Abstract, 2007, No. 10, pp. 705-714

Articles in Juridica International

Amendments to Procurement Contracts: Estonian Law in the Light of the Pressetext Ruling, Juridica International, 2010, No. 1, pp. 151-160
The Buyer’s Free Choice Between Termination and Avoidance of a Sales Contract, Juridica International, 2008, No. 2, pp. 43-53
Differentiation of Mistake and Fraud as Grounds for Rescission of Transaction, Juridica International, 2007, No. 1, pp. 142-151

BACK